Friday, November 13, 2020

Mainstream Media has been Weaponized and YOU are Being Attacked as we Speak!!!

To understand what we have been seeing this election cycle and to explain it to people who haven't always followed politics as closely as others have, I will tell you what I have seen and based on what I have seen happen before, going back to the 2008 and the 2012 elections.

What is going on right now, is that the mainstream media is being used in its most evil and sinister ways and they are actually deploying what should literally be interpreted as psychological warfare tactics, because that is exactly what they are. It is the truth, and this is really happening, and they are really doing this to the American public. 

This has been going on for the entire year of 2020 and has involved a planned and coordinated effort on the part of the national news outlets, the Democratic party, the Republican party, the social media giants Facebook, Twitter, and Google (to some extent, but it's unclear how involved Google actually is and has been, and I'm skeptical that they are terribly involved, if they are at all), and probably the Communist Chinese government to some degree, just to name some of the players involved.

Up until election night 2020, I had already noticed the hostile but very subtle and hard to notice tell-tale signs of this in the media since the beginning of the year. Regardless of the efforts of quite a number people and organizations, and even numerous people in national governments and/or former high ranking members of those governments, once the election took place and still wasn't offering them the apparent and definitive results they were all after, that's when the subtleties of the attack on the people in the U.S. were immediately swept aside and the intensity of the attack was no longer as much of a concern to the attackers as a total failure to succeed was, so most (but not all) of the efforts to conceal any of it were abandoned in lieu of focusing most efforts on winning no matter what had to be done to make that happen.

Now, understand that the people who are involved in this and with using these tactics have direct access to everything they need to make sure that none of this can ever be proven, and it never will be, but understanding who these people are and why it was important to them to remove Donald Trump as the President is key, and once I explain what most of you have already been seeing, then you will probably snap to the fact that what I'm saying makes sense and you just hadn't noticed it from the onset or when you saw what you saw.

It comes mainly down to the fact that Donald Trump isn't part of their club, and that club is what he and his people refer to as "The Swamp".  Another term for "The Swamp" is "The Establishment" which is what me and my people referred to it as for many years prior to the much better and far more befitting term "Swamp" was given to it by Trump and his folk to replace "Establishment", as the term establishment makes it sound far less dirty than it actually is. 

Swamp, is a good term for it, which is a place where water is stagnant and often toxic to the environment or the ecosystem surrounding it, and if you give the water a way out of the swamp or you drain it, then that gives opportunity for fresh and clean, life sustaining water to eliminate the toxicity that once prevented anything much at all to ever improve in the surrounding environment.

It is important to also understand here that not everyone in Washington, DC are swamp animals, or swamp rats as they're usually referred to, or even worse than that in some cases, scum which thrives on stagnant water and is what causes a great deal of the toxicity as a by product of its very existence, but there is only a certain number of people who are swamp thriving animals who exist there.

Just to name some of the swamp thriving and ultimately Anti-American wildlife that either lives there now or used to, here are a few:  John McCain, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, George W. Bush, Karl Rove, Joe Biden, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Barack Obama, and many, many others whom I haven't directly named here but are all part of the "Swamp" or the "Establishment" as it used to be known.  The critters who thrive on what is toxic to you and I, thriving on what makes things bad for us to benefit themselves at the cost of your well-being, these are just some of the bad actors who are hell bent on doing whatever it takes to keep anyone from removing the poison that they need to survive, and they will kill us if that is what it takes.  That is exactly what they are actively attempting to do right now.

You can always tell when the "Swamp" has been mobilized because one of their most effective and  favorite weapons of theirs to use against us, is the mainstream media, aka, the national news. They've worked hard over many decades building and shaping that industry into a culture of its own, within a culture, that enables them to mobilize this weapon which consists of components made up of individuals who are completely unaware that they are being used as a weapon. That is exactly what they are being used as. 

While there is a huge number of people who work in the news industry who have no idea this is going on, there are also a large number of people inside those organizations who do realize it, who have helped over the years to intentionally weaponize it, and who are ever-present in the event they are mobilized to make sure it works like it needs to and that the huge number of misguided souls being used against their own families and friends without either their knowledge or their consent,  do not ever realize or figure any of this out.  If they were to ever figure it out, which is highly unlikely because this seems like such a wild and impossible scenario, it would effectively destroy such an advanced weapon that has probably cost billions of dollars or even more over the years to create.

There have been people who had access to information to what I'm talking about who have come forward in the past and disclosed that the CIA had plants in various news organizations in the U.S. or other parts of the world, and for most of the time the simply did or do what other employees of those organizations do; investigate, write, research, report, anchor, etc...  Every now and then however, when the sewer rats who have placed these misused assets in places that U.S. law probably forbids them from performing what their legally performed jobs would be, whenever they are needed to jump into action and attempt to manipulate a situation such as an election that isn't going the way their masters need it to  go for instance, there has never been a more effective tool or a better disguise than the national news has been able to offer, and it has been used to distract, intimidate, coerce, manipulate, and ultimately to change the outcomes of things they wanted to turn out differently than what they seemed to be headed for prior to mobilizing this asset.

The first time I noticed what was going on with the mainstream news, and what it meant exactly, was back in 2008 and 2012 when the exact same tactics I'm seeing right now were used against the GOP Primary candidate Ron Paul. The mainstream media used one of their favorite parts of the weapon they are, which is the trustworthy and effective poll to electability doubt-casting tactic. The reason polls are a favorite tool is because people already know that polls shouldn't be interpreted as gospel because they can be much different from one source to another in comparing similar data they've compiled on a given subject, so for this reason, they don't even have to try to make it look accurate if they don't want to take the extra time to that. 

There is virtually no risk of any blowback to them for utilizing this swamp-rat minion favorite of theirs, and you will only see these weaponized tactics surface when there is a clear threat to the establishment or to the "swamp wildlife", so when someone like Ron Paul or Donald Trump gets closer to defeating every lesser or more subtle and harder to spot tactic they have tried, at some point you'll see a tactic like a doubt-casting tactic that is a bit more noticeable in a lot of cases than some less effective ones are. But when certain triggers take place, discretion always takes a back seat to effectiveness. This is often seen to most viewers simply as an "odd" occurrence or a strange anomale, and at most it typically only results in someone considering "why" they noticed what they just did for much more than a few minutes, which is usually the worst case scenario. It is usually just disregarded by a viewer as coincidence, albeit it might be an unlikely one in some cases, but a coincidence nonetheless and not worth devoting any time to thinking about.

So if you want to get rid of a candidate like say, Ron Paul, who isn't even in the same political party as the people doing 99% of the intentional manipulation to the viewers in most cases, using polls coupled with the assurance that pundits with expertise on what such polling numbers are indicating to be a likely outcome for the would-be nominee, it is not very hard to make people stop considering spending the one vote they have on a candidate that they otherwise prefer in every way more than another, and use it instead on the candidate that polls are suggesting has a better chance of winning a primary, or a general election. 

It is no secret that polls can be wrong, and nobody is forcing anyone else to choose one thing over another, so there is no avenue for anyone to use to even say much about news agencies using such tactics to get rid of a GOP candidate that they themselves probably believe would be a much bigger threat to beating their own Democratic nominee in the general election. It is a very dirty and underhanded tactic, it is very dishonest and is conceived from the very beginning with the absolute worst of intentions, but of course, that is only true if you're considering what it looks like from the viewpoint of a GOP voter even if they were to figure out what was going on, which is unlikely at best. What it looks like from the viewpoint of a Democrat is simply helping to ensure that their choice has a better shot at winning the election they want to see him or her win, and doing what they feel is the part that they can to best help that happen. If you can eliminate a candidate that better connects with people on any level better than another candidate does, then you have already done a great deal of work that the candidate you want to see win won't have to worry about themselves.

Tactics such as these don't seem to bother Democrats to any degree at all. Personally, I wouldn't be able to intentionally try to create doubt like this in someone's mind because even if it weren't completely immoral and inconsiderate to do so, what happens if the person I want to win isn't actually the best choice for the people I care about, or for my country? Ultimately, there's always that chance and then it would be on me for having secretly helped to get rid of a better candidate, and that might not just bite the other guys, it might bite me as well. The people who know that the mainstream media has been gradually weaponized over the years would not worry about this particular possibility anyway, only the reporters and anchors who have no idea that they are part of a political weapon might consider this, because all they feel like they're doing is being a good Democrat, or if it happens on the other side, a good Republican. Maybe they do it for brownie points and attaboys and obtaining enough notches to be promoted, but when it is mobilized in its weaponized form, you will see attacks from news sources emanating from the political left and the political right.

In pretty much all instances when you notice this happening, it means that some Swamp vermin is feeling that his or her hospitable habitat is in danger and has signaled for help, and it is provided within seconds in some cases, and simultaneously from pretty much all sides and all news delivery outlets. That is when voters should refrain from voting against any such candidate and consider electing them because that candidate is threatening someone's corrupt gravy train, and the more corruption you can get rid of the better it is for both sides and the worse it is for the establishment. Ultimately, the establishment only take the side which best serves the interests of fellow swamp vermin when one of their swamp neighbors is in a bind. Sometimes, taking out a single one of them might disrupt or eliminate certain wrongdoing on the part of all others, and they all know this which is exactly why they work together, from across the Isle, and do it better and with more determination and effort than for any other reason like for the good of all the citizens in this nation for instance, which rarely ever happens at all.

When the media effectively and very thoroughly threw wrenches into the gearbox of Ron Paul's GOP primary motor, from where I was sitting and with everything I knew, he would have had a far better chance of beating Obama for the Presidency than someone that was as out of touch with a regular American as Mitt Romney was. Paul even had Democrat voters who would have abandoned that party to vote for him in big numbers, but what is even probably more detrimental to the GOP than losing that chance was, is the fact that by marginalizing Ron Paul at that point in time, the Old Guard members of the GOP blew the much more important opportunity they had before them to bring young, liberty-minded, intelligent, logical, reasonable and respectable people who believe with everything in them in the principles of free markets, and understand how important they are, but they blew the chance to bring these youthful reinforcements into the party by the 10s of 1000s, and instead chose to consider things that a worried left had said in order to intentionally make Paul look a certain way and be viewed in a certain light within the GOPs own party. They, the mainstream media, did so deliberately with the intentions of trying to help a lesser candidate win the GOP primary because they knew that their candidate would have a better chance overall of beating Romney than he would have had at beating Ron Paul.

One of the most effective tools used against Ron Paul was the weaponized mainstream media, so when the signal came to mobilize it, a previously and somewhat supportive FOX News channel along with every liberally managed news outlet in the country just started brutally attacking Paul from every which way. It started with the polls and doubt-casting and just snowballed from there, and I watched while my jaw was on the ground in disbelief over how effectively these underhanded and dishonest tactics worked. 

As soon as Paul stepped down, I saw the joint attacks cease completely, and everyone reverted quickly back to the less obvious but still somewhat strange tactics of a weaponized media protecting the swamp things, but able to focus mainly on the concealment of that truth rather than primarily on eliminating a bigger threat to their establishment hack than Paul would have been. The weaponized media remained vaguely active until Romney was declared the GOP's nominee, and then just turned off like a light switch at that point in time, now things could play out according to partisan politics in whichever natural way it was going to, and the outcome would have virtually the same effect over the swamp no matter which way it ended up going.

None of this is to say that Obama would have been easily defeated by Paul, because I don't believe that at all. Ron Paul would have had to put in a lot of effort to win that election if he had won the GOP nomination, all I'm saying is that Romney never had a chance of beating him, but in the viewpoint of the only picture that actually matters here, that part of the issue only mattered if you were in the GOP and you were not also part of the swamp life, because Romney and Obama were both perfectly acclimated to the swamp and both still call it "home" to this very day.

And speaking of this very day, we find ourselves having just witnessed a number of things that brought the weaponized media right out into the daylight as well as a number of obviously dishonest activities taking place with very little attempt to conceal any of it during the current election. This election still hasn't been officially certified in any way as of yet. The media, including FOX News have all turned against Donald Trump, but only after a full year on the part of every outlet except for FOX, but with an obviously very determined and persistent swamp to get rid of Trump, that was busy doing whatever it took to get it done. 

They have pulled out so many things from their arsenal and a lot of them I have never seen them use, such as blaming a President for the global pandemic that began, oddly enough, in China. And it was also and equally as strange a coincidence that the Bidens had been secretively handling business in China and in recent days leading up to the outbreak of the virus, and various very questionable things have arisen from all of that. So interesting in fact that in regard to the Biden family, and in which that "family" has been implicated in, there is an active FBI criminal investigation which is still going on at present I'm assuming, since we haven't heard otherwise. 

In addition to all of that going on, which is one bizarre coincidence after another, and often a dead giveaway of the swamp things being directly involved, but then you have other unlikely things going on that happened for the first time this year, like Facebook, Twitter, and allegedly Google as well all being involved in censoring conservatives and the GOP. Supposedly it was "fact checking" on the part of Facebook and Twitter, and never an activity that either of those companies has been involved in doing from the very inception of either several years back until this year, when all of a sudden it seemed to begin out of nowhere, and as I watched it happening with my own eyes was as aware of the fact that it was only happening to Republicans who were posting as every other person who was using their platform was equally aware of that fact as well. For some reason, and even though most of it was obviously opinion, only Republican opinions were being censored and fact checked, and in many cases removed.

This translates to what is clear to me is a definite indicator that Facebook and Twitter both decided to take up new properties within the swamp, right along with the rest of the filthy things that live there and thrive amongst what is poison to anything that doesn't, like the people that you and I know, and so on and so forth. And it became apparent that this is probably correct considering that the media, including FOX News, and now social media is and has been carrying Joe Biden toward a finish line that they keep insisting he has already crossed, even though we can physically see that this isn't the case. And we are being told we have to accept what we are seeing because, well, they haven't said why, they just keep repeating that we have to. They even created a brand new government bureaucracy just for Smilin' Lyin' Joe and his corrupt Marxist running mate Camilla Harris called "The Office of the President-Elect", which existed immediately after the weaponized MSM decread Joe the presumed winner and did so without a single state's talleys having been legally or officially certified.

I watched the next day as Pfizer announced a 90% effective vaccine, which was mentioned on the Hoda show, so they brought in a doctor who seemed to imply quite plainly that only because Trump wasn't in office anymore that now there is a vaccine that works. About 1 1/2 minutes later, breaking news interrupted that show and low and behold, there was Joe Biden up there giving an official press conference as though he were already the acting President, and also acting as though he had everything to do with that Pfizer announcement and Trump had nothing to do with it. All of this activity and not a day or two after an election that anyone with half a brain suspects has been seriously tampered with in an effort to ensure Joe will win.

When that happened, and even though I knew what was going on already, at that point and with so much effort on the part of the establishment to reinforce a non-existent victory by Joe over Trump, and the constant repetitive brainwashing type subliminal messages being pumped into the homes of every American, I don't just believe this election has been completely rigged, I have no doubt whatsoever that it has been. The establishment only pulls vermin like Republican George W Bush out of his cage in the swamp and only 10 minutes after the vote counting began to congratulate the obvious and presumptive winner of the Election on national news, and who is in the opposing party to his own, when they are doing precisely what Pelosi said they were going to days prior to the election, "anything necessary", and the tone of her voice and her body language when she made that statement signalled more to me a willingness on her part to assassinate Trump rather than simply steal the election as they're trying to. 

They might even pull it off, but if they do and are allowed to by the people in this country, then those people aren't truly US Citizens because there's no way a genuine US Citizen would sit idly by and take that slap in the face with the genitals of so many swamp things without letting them know that there will be a cold day in Hell before they are allowed to do that and also steal an election in the same day.


------------------------------------
More to come later...
------------------------------------




0 comments:

Post a Comment

The Difference Between Now and 2016 Is...

The only difference between now and 2016 is that this time Trump was getting too many votes for the plan to work the way it was supposed to ...